Since the USA has illegally installed, against any and all Syrian wishes, several thousand plus soldiers and plenty of weapons (given to terrorists) on Syrian land, against that government’s and the Syrian people’s wishes, yet still and does claim doing so does not violate international legal and diplomatic normality, I think the equitable and most bona fide response for Syria is to deploy several thousand well-equipped soldiers on USA soil. Then supply militia with weapons and ammunition. Maybe in Wyoming and Montana?
What? You say that is not going to happen and Syria would be destroyed if they tried?
Then why the Hell are we doing it to Syria? If you do no think it is, “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!” , sort of a way to look at it…
Syria: The (Il)legality of the United States’ Use of Force Against Assad…
On April 6, the United States unilaterally used force in Syria, against President Assad’s regime, in response to Assad’s alleged use of chemical weapons against a Syrian town and region. Despite a…
Source: Syria: The (Il)legality of the United States’ Use of Force Against Assad
What is wrong with us in the US? We point fingers at others, yet we never, but never, lead by example…
WtR