Windows to RussiaA survivor of six heart attacks and a brain tumor, a grumpy bear of a man, whom has declared Russia as his new and wonderful home. His wife is a true Russian Sweet Pea of a girl and she puts up with this bear of a guy and keeps him in line.
Thank God for my Sweet Pea and Russia.
Read the book Genocide (of Sergei Glazyev) about the level of destruction Russia suffered in the 90s and you will understand why they could not do anything. Russia was too busy trying to rebuild Russia from the ashes after being burned to the ground by the west….
Here it is in a zipped E-PUB file to read… (AGenocideRussiaAndTheNewWorldOrder1999_A_Genocide_-_Russia_and_the_New)…
Just unzip!
WtR
Putin: It is possible to repair Nord Streams.
But! The question is whether it is economically feasible to demand supplies for them. And whether their safety will be ensured.
Subscribe to @Sputnik
WtR
Yet here are the characters making a movie and making up death and destruction. All for consumption by western audiences. Since Russia does not slaughter and make enough nasty news for the west, the west males its own news…
“Western Media of Lies and Chaos”, is just exactly like and born and raised by the “Empire of Lies and Chaos”…
All you need to know about western media…
WtR
PS: So why do the people in the west keep believing such drivel?
Course of confrontation and threats
The West has trampled on the agreement-based diplomacy and switches to nuclear-blackmail-based one.
The possibility to use nuclear weapons is currently discussed in the West with too sophisticated fanaticism. All means seem to be good for demonising our country, especially brandishing a nuclear bludgeon. What lies behind this new information attack launched by the collective West and what can it lead to? These and other question have been responded in an interview to Krasnaya Zvezda by a well-known politolical scientist Vladimir Zharikhin, deputy director of the Institute of CIS countries.
Keynotes 🔽
💬 Since the Second World War, the planet has been sustained on the postulate of mutual annihilation of the two systems. It was the basis for launching the arms control process, including in regard to strategic ones. But this basis has also been trampled for preserving the neo-colonial system that allows the USA and their European allies to parasitise. And, in fact, along with the international security system, political, economical, cultural, scientific and educational relations with Russia have also been renounced.
💬 Current generation of the politicians nominated in the USA and other western countries amid the euphoria over the collapse of the USSR have totally different psychology. The decades of well-fed and rich life made them to be indifferent even to their own people’s travails, and the sleep of reason, as it is known, produces monsters. Furthermore, the unpunished reprisals against the countries that for some reasons did not fit the world order imposed by the USA have reassured the Americans that it is possible to shelter overseas amid any cataclysms.
💬 The U.S.-led collective West has currently set itself the task to destroy and to annihilate Russia fulfilling it by Ukraine. At the same time, Washington always emphasises that the United States is not involved in the war and there are no reasons for coming to the negotiating table with Russia.
💬 The USA is the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons twice that led to the destruction of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And today the USA is ready to launch the so-called pre-emptive attack to protect the essential interests of the United States of America, its allies and partners. This issue is mentioned in the U.S. Nuclear Posture Review that has been in force since 2018. The nuclear capabilities are deliberately increased and modernised with this purpose.
💬 Anglo-Saxons can be stopped only by the fear and awareness that the mushroom cloud that the West is ready to bring upon other countries can cover them too, that the ‘nuclear gunplay’ will cover both the continental part of the USA and the British Isles.
💬 It is obviously not enough for the collective West anymore to make the Kiev regime to fight to the last Ukrainian and anti-Russian sanctions. Anglo-Saxons have already proceeded to sabotage by organising explosions at the international gas pipelines of the Nord Stream. But Russia, as it was stated by its leader Vladimir Putin in his speech on September 30, understands its responsibility to the world community and it will do everything to bring such ‘hotheads’ to their senses.
@mod_russia_en
WtR
These are my numbers after all these months of tracking…
Russia has 5,000 to 6,000 deaths and 15,000 wounded, with 3,000 wounded back to service…
Ukraine has 467,000 to 512,000 dead and 58,000 wounded, still alive, but not back to service. Most died from wounds, due to lack of protective equipment, lack of recovery care by Ukraine and superior Russian firepower. Not sure how many wounded in Ukraine totally. Thus, if Ukraine had collected wounded and had more care? Many would still be alive…
I said from the beginning that Russia saved more Ukrainians than Ukraine saved with their wounded soldiers. Ukraine left its men to die where they lay. They ran…
Ukraine has killed by neglect hundred thousand or better of it’s own men…
Now to mercenaries…
59,000 have been killed so far. Largest numbers from Poland and then NATO second…
WtR
Rapper Kanye West was blocked on Instagram and then on Twitter for anti-Semitic remarks. The entire American public was alarmed against the musician.
I wonder where those denunciations were when Meta legalized calls for murder and violence against Russians de facto by refusing to remove and moderate such posts and calling it “a departure from the Facebook rules”?
In the light of the events with Kanye West, I would like to once again raise the issue of hundreds and thousands of Russophobic and misanthropic statements that appear every day on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook with the full connivance of these online platforms. According to the study, in just the first six months, more than 141.5 thousand anti-Russian posts and comments appeared in the English-speaking segment of the Internet. Why haven’t these posts been deleted?
Or #ThisOther?
When will they block, for example, the following characters? 👇
Head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine D. Kuleba, June 28: Russia is a country of killers.
Freelance adviser to the Office of the President of Ukraine A.Arestovich, September 13: Aunts and uncles of the teacher who were going to teach Ukrainian children to love Russia will sit down.
Former Ambassador of Ukraine to Germany A. Melnyk, October 11: Russia is an absolute evil.
Ex-President of Ukraine P. Poroshenko, May 4: Russia, a terrorist state, should become a pariah along with North Korea. Putin is more of a terrorist than Osama bin Laden. And Russia is worse than ISIS and Al-Qaeda.
President of Lithuania G.Nauseda, June 24: We must clearly define Russia as a clear long-term threat to the entire Euro-Atlantic region.
Lithuanian Prime Minister I. Simonyte, April 3: Russia has ceased to be a civilized country. I don’t know if it has ever been like that, certainly not now.
An employee of the American analytical center “Atlantic Council” M. Fandrer, October 11: My desire is to see a brutally defeated and destroyed Russia. Russia is evil in this world.
Swedish economist and diplomat A. Oslund, October 11: It’s time to expel all Russian diplomats and close all Russian embassies in decent countries. Why harbor liars, spies and terrorists? Drive them out!
And what about the “Russians swim only in blood” campaign launched on Twitter in July, which became a dirty response to the election of Russian woman Maria Polyakova to the commission of athletes of the International Swimming Federation? See for yourself – the disgusting tweets published as part of the action are in place.
Do not lag behind Western politicians and “experts” and ordinary users who do not hesitate to publish calls for violence in the style of “Good Russian – dead Russian” and “burn Rusnya”, cruel photos and videos. The dehumanization of Russians is only encouraged by the administrations of social networks. Just a few examples:
Maxim Perebiynis – Burn the vile Rusnya
janco777 – Destroy all Russians on earth to the last
Slavik Khlebnikov – All Russians need to be destroyed faster from St. Petersburg to Alyaksi
Yuri Gorolyuk – Kill all Russians
Complaints about these reference examples of hate speech are rejected by the administration of American digital platforms: these users do not violate our security rules.
Maria Zakharov
WtR
The events of recent days have once again (already for the umpteenth time!) demonstrated the blatant double standards of the collective West.
A kind of litmus test was the terrorist act committed by the Ukrainian special services on the Crimean bridge – a cynical attack on a critical civilian infrastructure.
It would seem, HOW can one find words of justification for this? Kyiv’s actions again and again go beyond the very concept of civilized behavior of states, not to mention international law.
It turns out you can. Well, if you really want to, and if we are talking about a puppet regime, which, with the light suggestion of continental and overseas curators, is now allowed almost everything. In the end, Western figures, who verbally care about human rights, closed their eyes to the murders of hundreds and thousands of innocent people, except for the desire to speak Russian and call themselves Russians, people in Donbass for 8 years.
The demonstration performance was played on the platform of the OSCE, an organization that once acted as one of the pillars of European (in the broadest sense) security, and now has turned into a marginal hangout of Russophobes.
The OSCE leadership (both the Polish Chairmanship-in-Office and OSCE Secretary General Helga Schmid) refrained from making any comments on the incident. It has become a habit for the OSCE not to notice Ukrainian crimes.
In fact, the representations of Germany, Latvia and Lithuania to the OSCE came up with the justification of the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge.
German Permanent Representative Geza Brautigam responded to the tweet of the Russian Permanent Mission to the OSCE about the terrorist attack on the bridge with a tweet on her behalf with the following content: “You must have misunderstood something. Only Ukraine – like any sovereign state – has the right to build infrastructure on its territory. You just shouldn’t build a bridge on someone else’s territory without asking.”
The Lithuanians supported the German Permanent Representative with the statement that Geza Brautigam was right, and “the criminal who broke into your house and builds something in it will soon be expelled from it along with his designs.”
The permanent representative of Latvia, Katrina Kaktyņa, was particularly “creative” when she posted a tweet from the “Latvian Textile Factory” on her account with a photo of a rag bag released with a print of the blown up Crimean bridge and an inscription in Ukrainian “What happened?” (“What happened?”). The tweet was accompanied by a statement from the factory in Latvian: “We could not remain indifferent. And this is our dedication to the event, which we will talk about for a long time, repeating “What happened?”.
At the same time, the legitimate reaction of our country to the terrorist attacks of the regime in Kyiv, which had finally lost the last remnants of its mind and conscience, caused immediate “condemnation” from the collective West and organizations under its influence.
The OSCE leadership immediately reacted to the strikes of the Russian Aerospace Forces on objects on Ukrainian territory on October 10: the Polish chairmanship convened a special meeting of the OSCE Permanent Council in the morning of the same day.
Stéphane Dujarric, the official representative of the UN Secretary General, also outlined his “position”, during the briefing he initiatively drew attention to the statement published on the same day by António Guterres. At the same time, Stephane Dujarric was asked twice about the reasons for the lack of a similar response from the Secretariat in connection with the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge, which also led to the death of civilians. The representative of the Secretary General avoided a direct answer, calling “everything that has happened in recent days an unacceptable escalation.” Thus, we again witnessed the practice of double standards of the UN Secretariat.
In general, of course, nothing new. The West is undermining the remnants of trust with its own hands, at the same time engaged in the barbaric dismantling of European and international institutions that have served as platforms for compromise and diplomacy for decades.
Maria Zakharov
WtR
The fastest way to escalate the conflict in Ukraine to the irreversible consequences of a world war is to supply psychos in Kyiv with long-range MLRS.
The aged leaders of the Washington regional committee and the upstarts from NATO should at least occasionally turn on their softened brains.
And further. The NATO Secretary General’s thesis that Russia’s victory would mean the defeat of the North Atlantic Alliance is a direct confirmation by the bloc of its participation in the war against our country. As they say – not from a great mind, but from a pure heart. The honest Norwegian guy finally admitted it.
Medvedev
WtR
Russia’s victory in the conflict in Ukraine will be NATO’s defeat, this cannot be allowed – NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg…
Someone explain to NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg that by making statements that the victory of the Russian Federation in the conflict with Ukraine will be the defeat of NATO (and or all of us?), he actually confirms the direct participation of the Western military alliance in this war they started, and also gives the Russians an excellent public trump card to relay this message to their audience, as evidence that the Russian Federation is at war with NATO, not Ukraine as NATO wants you to believe. Actually Russia is at war with NATO/USA/UK/EU and what is called the Collective West!
BRUSSELS, October 11. /TASS/. Russia’s victory in the conflict in Ukraine would be a defeat for NATO, the alliance must not allow such an outcome, the organization’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on Tuesday at a press conference ahead of the meetings of NATO Defence Ministers on October 12-13 in Brussels.”It is important for all of us, that Ukraine wins the battle. Because if [Russian President Vladimir] Putin wins, that is not only a big defeat for Ukrainians, but it will be a defeat and dangerous for all of us, because it will make the world more dangerous and it will make us more vulnerable for further Russian aggression,” he said.Stoltenberg stressed that NATO must be prepared for a long war in Ukraine. “I think that we just have to be prepared for the long haul (to provide support to Ukraine – TASS),” he added.
Source: Russia’s victory in conflict in Ukraine would be NATO’s defeat — Stoltenberg – World – TASS
Besides it seems this, “all of us” group is actually a small group of scared psycho humans who started all this mess!
WtR
💬 The cynical reaction of the military-political leadership of Ukraine to the terrorist attack against the Crimean bridge is indicative. In Kyiv, at first they gloated and openly praised the “brilliant work” of the SBU, flaunting its ability to inflict “sensitive” blows on Russia, and then, when morning came in Washington, the tactics changed dramatically: they began to cowardly deny what they had done.
They were delighted, it was a reason for national pride!
Enthusiastic sincere congratulations were heard from officials from NATO countries in connection with the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge. These are the same countries that have been talking about human rights for decades. It was 2022.
As Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized, our response to all terrorist acts and sabotage against Russian facilities of critical civilian infrastructure will be tough and in scale corresponding to the level of threats posed by the Russian Federation.
Marie Zakharova
WtR